Singapore Budget 2018: 4 Major Grants And Schemes To Help Your Business

Singapore Budget 2018: 4 Major Grants And Schemes To Help Your Business

In his Singapore Budget 2018 speech on Feb 19, the Minister of Finance, Mr Heng Swee Keat, announced a multitude of measures to take local businesses to the next level.

With a massive budget of S$800 million set aside for the Enterprise Development Grant (EDG), the PACT scheme, and the Productivity Solutions Grant (PSG), these tools will help companies defray costs, facilitate innovation, and foster adoption of technologies and productivity boosters.

Here are four major business grants and schemes that will benefit your company.

1. The Enterprise Development Grant (EDG)

A combination of SPRING Singapore’s Capability Development Grant, and IE Singapore’s Global Company Partnership grant, this new streamlined effort is aimed at helping local businesses become more competitive both within and beyond national borders.

Companies that are looking to upgrade and expand internationally can use the EDG to cover up to 70 percent of qualifying costs and activities from FY2018 to FY2019.

Administered by Enterprise Singapore (ESG), a new statutory board under the Ministry of Trade and Industry, the EDG will be available for application through the Business Grants Portal (BGP) from the fourth quarter of 2018.

2. The PACT scheme

Managed by ESG and the Economic Development Board, the PACT scheme (also known as Partnerships for Capability Transformation) focuses on promoting collaboration between various businesses, from SMEs to larger corporations. It is a merged scheme that consolidates a number of existing grant schemes, served to support partnerships, into a single plan.

The result is a “more holistic” measure that will offer a maximum of 70 percent of qualifying costs, used for collaborative projects between companies in areas such as capability upgrading, business development, and internationalisation.

3. The Productivity Solutions Grant (PSG)

To encourage innovation, providing easier access to relevant, quality tools is imperative. The PSG was introduced to do just that.

Targeted at SMEs, it will fund up to 70 percent of eligible fees directed at the purchase of off-the-shelf productivity tools, including technology solutions and business equipment.

Not only does it integrate several existing grant schemes into a more focused effort, it also replaces the expired Production and Innovation Credit (PIC) scheme that supported smaller enterprises in adopting technology and equipment through tax deductions.

Applications through the BGP for the PSG will open at the start of April this year.

4. The Wage Credit Scheme (WCS)

An existing scheme that works to co-fund wage increases for employees, the WCS has been around since 2013, and will see another three-year extension, from 2018 to 2020. As before, it will support gross monthly wage increases of at least $50 for Singaporean workers up to a gross monthly wage of $4,000.

However, the percentage of government co-funding will decrease with each year – from 20 percent of qualifying wage increases in 2018, to 15 percent in 2019, to 10 percent in 2020.

According to Mr. Heng, the WCS is expected to cost about S$1.8 billion over the next three years, which will help businesses save a great deal of money. Not to mention, the scheme will alleviate unemployment concerns among local citizens with its pro-Singaporean hiring stance.

Related Business Insights

YOUR POINT OF CONTACT

Ang Lea Lea

Senior Tax Advisor

YOUR POINT OF CONTACT

Chester Leong

Regional Managing Director, BoardRoom Business Solutions

Fine-tuning the Quarterly Reporting regime to save on compliance cost? But who’s counting? (5 February 2018)

Fine-tuning the Quarterly Reporting regime to save on compliance cost? But who’s counting? (5 February 2018)

quarterly-report-imageIn the long-awaited outcome for SGX to reveal its plans for the Quarterly Reporting (QR) framework in Singapore, a Consultation Paper has been issued by the Exchange – worded in a way that seems to leave the decision-making in the hands of the investing public and corporate stakeholders. Some sectors may be comforted that the Consultation has taken into consideration certain options and alternatives which indicate a fine-tuning of the current QR framework, rather than an outright razing of the practice. Perhaps this is in response to the loud detractors of the QR since its inception.

MARKET-CAP CRITERION? YAY OR NAY?

quarterly-report-imageUnless you’re an ice-cream seller, it is near-impossible to please everyone. And I don’t think that SGX is going to find much luck in respect of this Consultation Paper. Some listed companies which hoped to be spared from what they claim to be a burdensome QR regime, citing unnecessary costs of compliance and reporting, will probably continue to gripe about retaining this practice. SGX has also been under pressure with the opinion that the QR regime makes Singapore unattractive to new IPOs. But is this true? Some Singapore companies which have attempted a dual-listing in an Exchange not-far-north have gone through much tighter listing-regulatory regimes and there doesn’t seem to be a lack of other companies trying the same.

One of the suggestions by SGX is to raise the market-cap criterion of listed companies that have to issue Quarterly Financial Statements from S$75 million to S$150 million. This criterion has been perceived as arbitrary and led to the view that this shifts the game towards institutional investors, where the reduction of transparency will further negate interest from retail shareholders and investors.

Although the raised-threshold addresses the reporting burden on smaller companies which may not have the resources for it, these same companies are also more likely to be family-run and do not fare as strongly for investor relations. Some analysts have noted that the Annual Reports of the smaller companies generally lack meaningful disclosure and therefore removing QR for such companies would further negate interest from investors.

Moreover, a “bright-line” criterion based on a market-cap quantum will bring further complications to companies with volatile share prices swinging between a bull and bear market. What if a company’s market-cap were to cross over and under S$150 million between quarters? And what of comparative-period financial information if a company was suddenly hurled above the threshold? Conversely, some minority investors hold the view that more regular information-flow is much needed during a bear-market and the market-cap is shrinking!

A CONSISTENT RISK-BASED APPROACH

Some capital market stakeholders have argued against a blanket-exemption, and for a risked-based approach. It has been suggested that listed companies with poor compliance records, qualified audit opinions, included on the SGX Watchlist etc, should not be exempted. Another suggestion in the SGX Consultation Paper allows minority shareholders to vote every 3 years on whether a Company can opt out of QR. This acknowledges that minority shareholders know best on whether frequent disclosure is important to their investment decisions.

Another critical question to be addressed – is this really about compliance cost? Quarterly financial reports are not required to be audited nor reviewed, and these are often already regularly provided by the Company’s in-house finance team. Most companies will probably have financial systems set up to monitor sales, expenses and receivables on a monthly-basis!

There are also other ongoing Consultation Papers issued by the SGX which indicate a more rigorous compliance regime – especially pertinent is the proposed Listing Rule changes consequential to Code of Corporate Governance review.

Here is my Personal Wish List resulting from this review –

quarterly-report-image

  • The frequency of reporting should not reduce from a quarterly-basis. But the extent of the disclosure should be amended to encourage more transparent information in a simple format.
  • GX RegCo should consider calibrating its approach to queries raised towards the listed companies on their disclosures. Very often, management of listed companies cite SGX-queries as a significant load on their reporting burden.
  • Should the frequency of reporting be reduced (say to half-yearly), the Board and Audit/Risk Committees of listed companies must continue to meet on at least a quarterly basis so as to ensure that business and risk developments are escalated and discussed. Critical developments could then be identified for Continuous Disclosure.

What I really hope to see – is for the QR framework to be enhanced in alignment with Corporate Governance and Continuous Disclosure, so that we address the most critical issues of information asymmetry and market efficiency.

Related Business Insights

YOUR POINT OF CONTACT

Ang Lea Lea

Senior Tax Advisor

YOUR POINT OF CONTACT

Chester Leong

Regional Managing Director, BoardRoom Business Solutions

Opportunity Still Exists For PIC Savings

Opportunity Still Exists For PIC Savings

It’s not too late to realise considerable tax savings for training, lease or purchase of IT and automation equipment, R&D, IP and other qualifying expenditures under Singapore’s soon-to-expire Productivity and Innovation Credit Scheme (PIC). Be prepared, however; tax authorities will be keeping a close eye on all incoming claims. You will also have to act fast; the program terminates for good at the end of your 2017 financial year.

PIC allows companies to deduct up to 400 per cent of the value of qualified expenditures to reduce their taxes. Alternatively, a company can convert up to $100,000 of qualified expenditure into a non-taxable cash payout at 40 per cent of that value. So the benefits can be considerable.

To take advantage, however, you will want to make sure that your claim meets all applicable rules and guidance from the IRAS. As a general rule of thumb, for example, you will want to make sure that both payment and delivery of any qualified products or services occurs before the close of your 2017 financial year.

How might this apply in the real world? Let us say that your company signs an agreement in September, 2017 for employee training on a new business process. While you make full payment upon the contract’s signing, the training itself does not occur until August of 2018. In such a case, the IRAS will likely treat the training as not qualified for PIC.

If you are still in your 2017 financial year, you can still realise tax savings under PIC. If you have moved on to 2018, the window of opportunity is closed.

Other restrictions may apply to your particular tax situation. Additional information on PIC can be found here.

Related Business Insights

YOUR POINT OF CONTACT

Ang Lea Lea

Senior Tax Advisor

YOUR POINT OF CONTACT

Chester Leong

Regional Managing Director, BoardRoom Business Solutions

Singapore Budget 2016

Singapore Budget 2016

Related Business Insights

YOUR POINT OF CONTACT

Ang Lea Lea

Senior Tax Advisor

YOUR POINT OF CONTACT

Chester Leong

Regional Managing Director, BoardRoom Business Solutions

The Companies (Amendment) Act 2014

The Companies (Amendment) Act 2014

Related Business Insights

YOUR POINT OF CONTACT

Ang Lea Lea

Senior Tax Advisor

YOUR POINT OF CONTACT

Chester Leong

Regional Managing Director, BoardRoom Business Solutions

Singapore Budget 2015

Singapore Budget 2015

Related Business Insights

YOUR POINT OF CONTACT

Ang Lea Lea

Senior Tax Advisor

YOUR POINT OF CONTACT

Chester Leong

Regional Managing Director, BoardRoom Business Solutions

Hong Kong Budget 2015/16 Synopsis

Hong Kong Budget 2015/16 Synopsis

Related Business Insights

YOUR POINT OF CONTACT

Ang Lea Lea

Senior Tax Advisor

YOUR POINT OF CONTACT

Chester Leong

Regional Managing Director, BoardRoom Business Solutions

Establishing WFOE in the PRC

Establishing WFOE in the PRC

Related Business Insights

YOUR POINT OF CONTACT

Ang Lea Lea

Senior Tax Advisor

YOUR POINT OF CONTACT

Chester Leong

Regional Managing Director, BoardRoom Business Solutions

Wealth Manage Tool

Wealth Manage Tool

Related Business Insights

YOUR POINT OF CONTACT

Ang Lea Lea

Senior Tax Advisor

YOUR POINT OF CONTACT

Chester Leong

Regional Managing Director, BoardRoom Business Solutions

How to utilise “CEPA”

How to utilise “CEPA”

Related Business Insights

YOUR POINT OF CONTACT

Ang Lea Lea

Senior Tax Advisor

YOUR POINT OF CONTACT

Chester Leong

Regional Managing Director, BoardRoom Business Solutions